Find a Lawyer

MST. RAJAN versus IBRAR HUSSAIN

Failure to present the Revenue Authority's Revenue Record to the Gift Exchange Proof of the Gift, the plaintiff claims that he is the co-owner of the suit land because the gift of the property owned by his brother had gone to allegation that the suit had no Not a gift. The ground was made in favor of the plaintiff and neither the original mutation was created nor the plates that were not entered into the mutation nor the officer affirming the trial as a witness On the record of which no evidence on record was related to the facts of the gift itself. The defendant has neither presented nor stated that the possession of the suit land was conveyed to the defendant under the gift by the deceased, nor that the deceased had declared a gift in favor of the defendant but the plaintiff was sued. The verdict is in favor of the plaintiff, but the appellate court allowed the appeal and the case was dismissed. Since there is no evidence on record in support of the alleged gift in F. The appellate court, in the presence of the defendant by the plaintiff's owner, denied the trial court's decision and decree, and had exercised material misconduct in exercising jurisdiction. It was said that a valid gift was given in favor of the defendant by the deceased Malik High Court. The judgment and order of the appellate court and the trial court were set aside and restored lawer from fb area from Kot Addu lawyer