Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus AHMAD

Article 42 & Constitution 54 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Failure to locate facts by the courts below title to suit land, Failure to demarcate land, the claimant owns the land Claimed to have 75 tree trial courts on it. The case was dismissed but the appellate court allowed the appeal and, with the amended jurisdiction, ruled out the suit to the High Court, the decision and the order passed by the appellate court were the defendant's argument that, without limitation, Can't justify the case. The three courts, together with the fact that the plaintiff was the owner of the land on which the 75 trees were located, the defendant failed to bring anything on record to show that the suit was owned by the land. he has. On behalf of the defendant himself, he confers any honor on the ground, in the same way as regards 75 trees when the fact that the trees were planned was denied by the plaintiff by the plaintiff. All the factual findings did not interfere with the suit regarding the ownership of the suit land. power of attorney advocate Deh Pathaan lawyer