Find a Lawyer

PERVAIZ AKHTAR versus CHIEF INSPECTOR OF MINES

Para 16 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (forthcoming IX of 1974), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Post Office of Enumeration for Firm Man of Electrical and Mechanical Cadre Base Seniority Low Fitness Qualification Diploma in Instrument Technology Post ? The mechanic was renamed as Rescue Apparatus Technician. The respondent was a public servant employed as a mechanic in 1986, while the applicant employed a public servant in 1987, as an electrician petitioner promoted a civil servant. He was not employed in the post. The service tribunal considered for publicity allowed the appeal filed by the plaintiff public servant and was promoted to the position which the applicant public servant had raised, even if the name change was put aside. The defendant, a civil servant, was not entitled to development in his position. He said that the precision in electrical / mechanical technology was obtained not in apparatus technics but in diploma in instrument technology under the Punjab Labor and Main Power Inspectorate of Mine Service Rules. Under U-16, five years of experience was also eligible for development, the service tribunal said I did not inspect the case of the boxes, the applicant was also eligible for Primary Fax. Instead of promoting the cadre of the Forman Supreme Court, it was appropriate to remand the case to the service tribunal for a re-examination of the case, instead of ending the question of development on the post of respondent public servant. After giving the two parties a fair hearing, the Punjab Labor and Manpower Department of Power inspected the mine. advocate for immigration from Dhoun Kal lawyer