Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR

Sections 12, 27 (b) and 42 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) require the defendant to demand the specific performance of the contract for the sale of proof of contract whether the receipt of the sale of the dwarf fraud buyer's evidence for the price. Opposed this case. On the principle that he was a purchaser of value without the prior contract notice in favor of the plaintiffs and relied on the receipt of the sale in connection with the payment of the dues in his favor to the suit property owner, Which was allegedly issued prior to the agreement. The defendants of the sale did not say the contract in their favor which was later implemented on the basis of the receipt of the sale, on the contrary, the execution of the contract by the plaintiff on the testimony of the owner of the letter and the minor witness. The source was proved that the property did not mention the execution of the contract in favor of the defendant in his written statement and the testimony allegedly furnishing the written receipt by the defendant in receipt of the sale. And it was a fabricated document because the same charge was written by the owner's special counsel and the owner did not have any special Optional lawyer was denied execution. Respondents of the High Court had properly maintained both the courts below on this matter. The High Court's decision failed to identify any legal weakness, the appeal denied by the Supreme Court for bail was denied. ask a advocate free from Alipur lawyer