Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYUB versus PAKISTAN RAILWAYS

Constitution of Paras 1724 and 1725 Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railway Scope prohibiting the employment of civil servants from the employment of public servants (talent and discipline) rules 1975, and The punishment was mandatory. The Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railways was assigned without any reason for retirement from employment who interferes with the order passed by any competent authority and the service tribunal has been sentenced and dismissed, in practice. Pakistan Railways can amend the order passed by the competent authority after giving notice of the showcasing notice to the public servant, under autonomous powers under paragraphs 1724 and 1725 of the Pakistan Railway Personal Manual, exercising such discretionary power with respect to the amount of punishment. Should not be done and should be increased. To be punished by reviewing authority without cause, the Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railways should verify the order of any unlawful use of punishment in the case of unlawful discretion and give it to the civil servants by the authorized authority. The sentencing sentence will meet the conclusion of justice under which the application for leave of appeal was changed by the Service Tribunal approving the appeal and decision. immigration advocates from Rashidabad lawyer