SHARBAT versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, further investigation, the defendant's grant was not fatally shot and no fire was fired from his gun. The common allegation was that all the accused had issued the challenge. The co-accused was granted bail due to a legal delay while the accused were in custody for about one year and did not see any progress in the proceedings, only the official witness, the medical officer, examined. Further investigation of the responsibility is required. Being a good case, their being absconded should not come in the way of guaranteeing the absconder, though some of his rights will be lost, but he will not be lost forever, and will be fair and fair. Will be entitled to trial. At the appropriate time, the accused was entitled to bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Manga Mandi lawyer