RASHID HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
The difference between the time shown in the FIR in Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), the Section 324 guarantee, and the occurrence of the medico legal certificate were fully explained, justifying the false chances of the defendants in this case. Nothing to indicate. The complainant side was already aware that the ocular version of the injured woman was proved by medical evidence and that the accused recovered blood stained knife and stained blood with knife after the incident of his blood stained shirt tire. With the knife, no basis, preliminary aspect, was not available to suggest that the accused did not commit the alleged crime, the accused was denied on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Bhirya Road lawyer
