Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAZIR KHAN versus THE STATE

Sections 514, 498 and 561 of the A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/324/148/149 of the arrest of the seized applicant after appearing in the trial court after obtaining interim bail pre-arrest orders from different courts. Appeared on the date set for. The Last Bail Order Trial Court initiated proceedings against the applicant and its guarantees under Section 1414, CRPC, as a result of the failure of its submission on the date set forth in the first bail order, validity. The record shows that upon the expiry of an order passed by a court, the applicant received another order from another court of competent jurisdiction. The applicant did not attempt to impeach or abuse the court. And neither he nor his guarantees violated the terms of the bond without the trial court seeing its record and We had refused relief to the applicant without pre-arrest bail. In order to justify his claim, the trial court did not agree with the dignity and decorum of the courts, which are protected places for the protection of abortion rights. The High Court accepted the plea and abolished the defamation proceeding, resorting to the freedom of the people, and the process of controlling and not controlling them. immigration advocates phone number from Multan lawyer