Find a Lawyer

ASIF versus THE STATE

Section 497 crime of adultery (Enforcement of Jewish Ordinance (VII VI 1979), Section 13/14/18/19 (2)), records show that the complainant policeman was normal in the area and arrived at the scene. To receive the detective's information, the complainant crossed the wall and entered the house and peered through the ventilation and was told that three couples in the FIR were engaged in fornication anywhere, it was reported that the complainant's other partner also They had entered the house or witnessed the incident which led to their action. R had arrived, but none of them had seen the alleged commission of the rape accused that he had not been examined by the FIR to confirm the allegations, yet the charges against the accused were revealed. It had not yet happened famous high court advocate from Rahimyar Khan lawyer