Find a Lawyer

MST. SAEEDA BEGUM versus CHAUDHRY MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

For the specific performance of the Section 12 suit sale agreement, the plaintiff, who was the defendant's tenant, claimed that the defendant had agreed to sell the property, executing the suit property sale agreement, The plaintiff further claimed that he had paid the defendant and the balance for the balance. He was to be paid on the registration of the sale contract, but refused to perform his part of the contract. The plaintiff's trial court in the plaintiff's trial barred the agreement from the plaintiff's trial. Was denied. According to the trial court's decision and decree, the defendant's signature on the contract of sale as per the nomination and when the defendant's sample signature was obtained from the defendant's defendant, the different plaintiff neither presented the stamp vendor nor Someone who allegedly typed in a sale agreement. Extraordinary witnesses were presented to prove the execution of the sale agreement The plaintiff had failed to prove that the defendant had, in his favor, prevented the sale agreement from being properly excluded. The appellate court took legal action without a legal decision that relied on the implementation of the documents, which did not prove to be valid and the order passed by the appellate court was set aside. One approved by the trial court, rejecting the claimant's claim and restoring it law firms from Fateh Pur lawyer