Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QAYYUM versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) / 324 / 337f (ii) / 34 Sentencing, the value of the evidence was the presence of both witnesses on the incident was beyond any doubt the length of the firearm injury to the person injured by the injured prosecutor's witness. At the time of the incident, his presence, on this occasion, could not be doubted, both witnesses were dismissed in a very natural way; the evidence of both witnesses, who are linked to true and inspirational faith. Depending on the conviction, the conviction of the accused should be maintained. However, the prosecution failed to prove the motive of his case, and the immediate cause of the murder of the victim was mysterious. The accused did not challenge his sentence, but because of this he demanded reduction of his sentence. The motive for the incident was never proven. At the time of the prosecution and the incident at the trial, the accused had a modest record that on the day of the incident, the accused was to be extraordinarily punished. The position was not appropriate to uphold the conviction of the accused; his sentence was reduced from death to life imprisonment with the benefit of Section 382B, CR PC. criminal advocate from Chilas lawyer