Find a Lawyer

GUL MUHAMMAD TABASSAM versus GULSHAN ARA

Article 199 West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Section 5 and Schedule and Section 14 High Court's jurisdiction The conclusions of the Family Court and the Appellate Court cannot be successfully ruled in the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction. Jurisdiction not exceeded, processed without jurisdiction or the results were not based on any evidence The constitutional petition would not lie to challenge the ruling that the evidence was not properly defined in this case because the authorized jurisdiction The finding of the facts recorded by the courts cannot be disturbed simply because On the one and the same evidence, it is possible that the High Court cannot sit in its constitutional jurisdiction as an appellate court and the finding of the facts recorded by the courts invested by the courts to decide the cases is not an option. Can make Constitutionally the contents of the evidence on record by the courts below have been dismissed from the petition filed against them. divorce advocates from Hub Inds Estate lawyer