Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD LATIF versus MUHAMMAD LATIF

Article 42 and 12 12 of the specific performance case for the sale and declaration of the contract The plaintiff claimed that the defendant who owned the suit land agreed to sell the land to the plaintiff and the plaintiff paid the plaintiff the entire amount. Who also hanged the registered general. The plaintiff alleged in her favor that the defendant had sold the suit in favor of another person under the registered sale deed in contravention of the said agreement which was illegal, invalid and unlawful on the rights of the plaintiff Wendy. Was effective. The suit, for the price and without notice, was a substantial purchaser of the land, and that he had no knowledge of the contract between the plaintiff and the plaintiff's trial pronounced the decision of the suit filed by Wendy and also stated that he Was not aware of the agreement. Allegedly neither reached the plaintiff nor the plaintiff nor did he plead, nor did he state in evidence that he had told his vendor. E said that the seller or his rights in any way for the matter. I was aware of the agreement at the time of sale. The trial court, in the circumstances, did not reverse the appeal filed by the trial. He committed any fraud or alleged fraud. The plaintiff had proved that the plaintiff had received fraudulent money under the agreement. The High Court had set aside the judgment and the trial court's order had also approved the receipt of money in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. ? Which was fraudulently obtained by the claimant immigration advocates phone number from Killa Abdullah lawyer