ISHFAQ MEHBOOB versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SADDAR, SHUJABAD, MULTAN
Article 199 (1) (b) (i) Applicants to the detention center were allegedly snatched by the applicant's marriage with the abductor, had no fault of their parents, and the abductor No relationship was presented as a witness. The marriage contract was, in fact, the present case of Paramor, who sought the recovery of the alleged wife, whether the abduction was genuine or not, a question which could not be resolved by the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction because this fact. There were conflicts of interest. The abductor, who was living with his parents, cannot be said to be in illegal custody so that the applicant can seek alternatives available to him under the legal alternative. The court should refrain from issuing a writ in favor of Paramore for these reasons. The daughter and, ultimately, the allegations are not found to be true, so the parents will have to suffer an irreparable loss of their family honor.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
