Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus THE STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 302 (c) were immediately named as the main culprits in the FIR Complainant Party, charged with defining the evidence and were alleged to be residents of the same area, misidentification There was no possibility of the accident with the accused. Rifles and motions were also alleged that the accused was found guilty during the interrogation; the complaining party had no previous rivalry for the false execution of the accused except the real culprit. And was a witness to the prosecution. The actual cousin of the deceased, but the mere relation of the prosecution witnesses with the deceased, had no basis for excluding their testimony unless they were proved to be incompetent and uninteresting witnesses and no such evidence was on record by the defense. Were not brought in to prove they were unauthorized. The accused presented by the complainant and the prosecutor's testimony was fully verified by the ocular account. The medical evidence against the accused was, on the contrary, proved beyond any doubt that most of the accused. Opposition was tried under PPC, PPC instead of section 3022 (b). According to the prosecutor's story, he had no power, the suspect armed with a rifle on the way, and the defense proposal that occurred in the fields was also without any basis, because the blood-stained land was in his possession. Was taken where, the prosecution, the incident took place and the trial court could not interfere with the recorded sentence and sentence against the accused. immigration advocates contact from Ghazi lawyer