Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GUL MUHAMMAD TABASSAM versus MST. GULSHAN ARA


Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction The concurrent results of the above courts in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court cannot be successfully accepted, unless the courts exceed the jurisdiction, acting without any jurisdiction or results. If not based on any evidence, the constitutional petition would not lie to challenge any order. The evidence in this case is not properly appreciated because the finding of the facts of the jurisdiction authorized by the courts cannot be bothered simply because another view on the same evidence is possible in its constitutional jurisdiction. Cannot sit as a court. The appeals and the fact finding recorded by the courts below could not be substituted as the matter should be decided by the courts which have been decided with jurisdiction.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Poonch lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.