Find a Lawyer

GUL BAHAR versus FAYYAZ AHMAD

Sections 355 and 356 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (i), the defendant believed that the proceedings against him would be canceled for the sole reason that during the proceedings of the inquiry the testimony of the witnesses by the magistrate Statements were recorded and not recorded. Under Sections 355 and 356, the CC's contention, by the magistrate himself, was without any power as the main essential requirement was the presence of a magistrate or a session judge while evidence was being recorded when witnesses' statements were signed by the trial magistrate. Was present and it was evident from the record that these statements were recorded in the presence of the magistrate as all the statements were observed and accepted that the statements of the witnesses were recorded in the presence, hearing and personal direction and under the supervision of the magistrate. Were. immigration advocates phone number from Fateh Pur lawyer