Find a Lawyer

DR. GHULAM FAREED MALIK versus IKRAM SAQLAIN HAIDER

Section 417 (2A) Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 29 (2) (a) (b) Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 320/279/427 of the High Court Delay for Appeal Against Evil Delegation Appeal filed before the wrong forum was filed by the complainant initially under Section 35435, the CCP approved by the magistrate review petition. Challenging the order, the sessions judge dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction. The complainant applied for a copy of the order on 10 8000, which was delivered to him on 8 8 2000, against the acquittal on the grounds that the accused was not guaranteed on 8 8 2000, in section 29 (2) (a) of the High Court. (b) I had no choice. The Limitation Act and if each jurisdiction can be used to delay concession, must be specified by the complainant every day, delay in filing an appeal can be condoned until the date of the 9th Session Court decision. Is. 8000 or even 8000 to supply a copy of the order from 8 8000 to 18 8000 but the complainant did not specify the delay from 18 8 2000 until the appeal was filed before the High Court which resulted in the delay. The petition filed for condolences was delayed by approximately 21 days criminal advocate from Poonch lawyer