Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ versus THE STATE

Section 2?b (b) and 34 34 compliment of the evidence, two versions of it and the time and the accompanying weapons as well as the death toll were recognized, but approximately hours to 34 hours after the incident. Police were later notified. The incident happened at around 10am in a nice fare place and at the time of the incident, besides the complainant, several others were present on the spot, who witnessed the incident, but none of them complained. The victim allegedly did not bother to inform the police. Such delay in reporting the matter to the police has established that the FIR was prepared after deliberation, in which case, the complainant's statement about the delay in filing the FIR Had no significance and was reinforced by such delays. The defendant's argument that the prosecutor wasted time to compile the story for making false accusations of innocent people. Support for the case was relied on by prosecutors who were related to the prosecution, although they supported the prosecution's case, but the unusual delay in filing an FIR was sufficient to doubt their presence. And at the same time, his credibility story is told by the witnesses. Nevertheless, it was not understandable that the prosecution's case was also dismissed by the investigating officer and other police officers as the victim was given death in various circumstances, as his statement defended the incident. At the time, the victim, who was a man of bad character, tried to forcibly abduct the accused's real sister, but right away top civil advocates from Jalozai lawyer