Find a Lawyer

DR. NAZIR AHMAD QURESHI versus RASUL BAKHSH BAHADUR KHAN LEAGHARI, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIALKOT

S 65 Law Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 76 Synopsis (Document forming the grant of land for religious purpose under Hindu law) to prove the document through secondary evidence Original document to own this suit property Were not submitted and instead a certified copy of the document was filed with the court with evidence. The defendant was that without trial the record of the original document was lost or destroyed without evidence, the contentious document in the trial has to be admitted with evidence. The valid document must be obtained only by preliminary evidence. Had to be proven until a case for secondary evidence could be established. There is no evidence of loss or fate under section 65 of the Evidence Act, 1872 (Evidence of Law, Article 76, 1984). The termination of the original document was available on record, the admission of proof of the document was illegal and without any jurisdiction, the decisions and orders under the two courts were set aside and the case dismissed. immigration advocates from Depal Pur lawyer