Find a Lawyer

WAPDA versus MESSRS SUPER STEEL MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED

Article 26 (6) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution shall be referred to the Provincial Government, which is in section 26 (6) of the Electricity Act, 1910, on the dispute of the Advisory Board between the parties. A decision not to appeal was sent to the Electric Inspector for a decision. The Electric Inspector sent a copy of the decision to the Advisory Board to the authorities that it was deemed to have sent a copy of the decision to the Advisory Board so that the user acknowledged its accuracy. Does not The order of the Electric Inspector and the Board should proceed to decide on the merits of the matter if the licensee or user was not satisfied and, therefore, did not accept the decision of the Electric Inspector, the matter was the language of the Provincial Government. Can send to. Used in the provisions of Section 26 (6) of the Electricity Act, 1910, did not say that the user or the license could file an appeal. The High Court, explaining these words, would be referred to the Provincial Provincial Government. Believed that these words had to be used as referring to a reference right; in other words, the right to appeal to a dissatisfied party if the authorities did not accept the fresh order of the electric inspector, before the advisory board. You could demonstrate your dissatisfaction with filing a reference / appeal, if any reference / appeal from the dissatisfaction party is present In this case, the Advisory Board could not investigate it. Failure to file any reference to the accuracy and legality of the order of the Electric Inspector will give the Advisory Board the power to review, which the Provincial Government does not authorize by the Board's constitution family advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer