Find a Lawyer

COLONY TEXTILE MILLS LTD. ISMAILABAD, MULTAN THROUGH FACTORY MANAGER versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MULTAN ELECTRICITY POWER COMPANY LTD., MULTAN

Article 26 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Authorizing the authority to examine the charge of electricity theft, the Supreme Court referred the matter to the chief executive of the Electric Supply Company, directing it to determine the dispute. Will do accordingly. After engaging both parties in the process of testing meters and other controversial devices and giving both sides an opportunity to hear, and who seems frustrated by the chief executive's decision, he resolves his complaint in accordance with the law. can do. The chief executive of the Electric Supply Company, which handled the matter under the apex court's order, had given the decision a day earlier through a constitutional petition filed by the chief executive under the apex court order. Was and was given. The constitutional petition, subsequently established, was wrong in that the originator and the applicant had their own treatment elsewhere and not before the High Court on charges of theft against the pending, under the provisions of section 26A of the Electricity Act, 1910. , It was only the licensees who could test the meter and not the electric inspector best law firm from Lasbela lawyer