Find a Lawyer

NASIR versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) Definition of Evidence Before the trial, the complainant had died and the prosecutor's witness, who was the brother of the complainant, was interested in the accused and admitted before the trial court that he had admitted No statement was made to the police. The statement of the prosecution witness did not affect the conviction, and the prosecution's other witness did not say anything about the fire that killed the victim, nor did the suspect suffer any injuries. Other casualties received a fair injury. The prosecution's own case was not told that the co-accused had initiated the initial aggression against the complaining party alone and the accused was not going with the co-accused when the incident started. The prosecution had its own case. Was attracted to The victim had already received his injuries at the hands of the co-accused Pro. The security failed to prove the motive established by him. No weapons were recovered from the possession of the accused doctor, who performed a post-mortem examination of the deceased's body. The prosecution could have been the result of the trial court's alleged involvement before the prosecution was not presented. The accusation of extortion by the complaining party, in these circumstances, was entitled to take advantage of the doubt and the accused was convicted and acquitted by the trial court. online advocate from Shakargarh lawyer