SIMPEX TRADING CORPORATION versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB
Sections 182, 186 and 226 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, were opposed by the suit for the collection of money for the short supply of goods on the basis of the R2 suit agreement and stated that it was merely Is an agent and acts on its behalf. The International Telecommunication System, which is a foreign company, and was not an independent contractor based on the case was filed on the basis that it was stated that the defendant was contracting with the corporation and Ben The international telecommunication system was mentioned only in a clause of the contract that contained only the terms of the conduct. There was nothing in the contract to pay the cost of the contract and it was also suggested remotely that the defendant was acting as an agent of the illegal company, saying that under the corporation of the contract, under the defense corporation law. He was obliged to pay for the supply of goods made by him. Defendants are entitled to recover the amount of the case and, on the order passed by the trial court, the appeal cannot be interfered with.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
