Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR AHMAD versus IKHLAQ AHMAD

Section 13 & Q 13 of the Law of Martyrdom (1984 of 1984), Arts 76 76 and 77 77 Suits have provided evidence of the dialogue to confirm the cases that he sent notice of the student's eyes to the registered post and he The record was submitted on postal receipt, but he did not present the post office clerk as proof of his claim; the effect was, in the case of the plaintiff, a pre-discrimination affidavit, that he did not have to disclose anything through the post. But also to prove that the notice was contained in the post envelope and for that purpose the plaintiff should have filed an application in the trial court for the preparation of the original notice and if he had If not, the plaintiff may present secondary evidence with the permission of the court, as was considered in the present case, under the testimony of the plaintiff, Artists 76 and 77 of the 1984 plaintiff, legal to present the original notice or to present the secondary evidence Did not adopt the procedure in which the court was dismissed for failing to present the plaintiff's notice; the trial court did not allow him to take notice. The plaintiff showed in the evidence, had failed to prove the circumstances. That they had in fact sent notice of the appellate court's notice that the plaintiff had proved to be a student in accordance with the law, not intact And the High Court set aside in reviewing the judgment passed by the appellate court divorce advocates from Lodhran lawyer