Find a Lawyer

DUR MUHAMMAD versus ABDUL SATTAR

Section 5 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, A. XXXIII, R 6, O XIX, R 6 & OX, R 1 Appeal was filed for hearing on 10 9 2002 but the decision was pronounced on 27 9 2002. The request for review was banned The principal ground for condolences for a delay of up to six days was that the Advocate On Record, which was kept in Lahore, could not contact this lawyer because it Is fully convinced that since the said lawyer was also kept in Lahore. He was already in Islamabad, as well as appearing in a case whose fixed accuracy in history was to be prepared with the case in the presence of the Advocate on record and in the absence of his lawyer, The Advocate Online Record does not, in all probability, present itself to the court and inform your lawyer of the situation, otherwise his sense of responsibility and devotion to duty will be monitored. Bound. If in fact he was particularly busy at the time of his being available in Islamabad law, he did not need to, who kept away from the list and proceedings of the matter even after a period of two weeks. Did not choose to sue. It is important that the Advocate On Record be made in accordance with the provisions of OXIX, R 6, Supreme Court Rules, 1980, with notice of the declaration of judgment in person, and that sufficient and reasonable adherence to the rules was known by the caseload. Listing an appeal hearing, the party must inquire about the fate of the appeal and knowing that the decision will be repeated on the merits. divorce advocates from Bhuawana lawyer