In the constitutional application of Arts ? (185 ()) and 199 Constitution, the petitioners petitioned in Ounce for claiming to be a resident of the Katchi population and denied the government's ownership of the disputed area taken by the applicants. The government had failed to present it to the High Court, since some applicants approached the High Court, so they had to provide some credible documentary evidence to show that the applicants' houses were located in the area. , It was not the government applicants. Cannot change burden on authority. Applicant failed to disclose any legal right that could be enforced through constitutional petition; leave of appeal was not interfered with in order passed by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
