Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GOVERNMENT OF SINDH versus ABDUL SATTAR SHEIKH


Article 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Implementation of the Civil Service Rule of Luxury Policy issued a notification ordering respondents' development to be implemented after more than two years. Veterans enjoyed the benefits of the notification. Another notification was issued and before the withdrawal of these facilities, the High Court ruled in favor of the respondents that the facility / privileges could not be withdrawn on the principle of Lux punity and it has also been observed. That no notice was given before the second notification was issued, neither the respondents nor the opportunity to be heard was taken by the Government. The second notification was to correct a mistake. Was issued but failed to identify an error in the earlier notification but the appeal was allowed Was left out

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Mian Walli lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.