SHAHEEN AIRPORTS SERVICES versus SINDH EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTIONS
Section 20 (1) and 23 Provincial Employees \ Social Security (Contribution) Rules, 1968, R6 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Contribution, Increase in applicant employees, satisfied that 50% amount under Section 23 Demand for increase in Provincial Employees \ Social Security Ordinance, 1965, read with R6 of Provincial Employees R Social Security (Partnership) Rules, 1968, was not ratified because it cannot be concluded. That the applicants fail to pay the due date of payment of compensation shall be allowed to appeal under section 20 (1) of the Provincial Employees \ Social Security Ordinance, 1965 The Supreme Court's holiday had passed to consider. Whether the facts of the present case had attracted the decision of the Supreme Court through legal heirs in the case of M. Imamuddin v. Syria Khartam.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Ghazi lawyer