Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SHAHEEN AIRPORTS SERVICES versus SINDH EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTIONS


Section 20 (1) and 23 Provincial Employees \ Social Security (Contribution) Rules, 1968, R6 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Contribution, Increase in applicant employees, satisfied that 50% amount under Section 23 Demand for increase in Provincial Employees \ Social Security Ordinance, 1965, read with R6 of Provincial Employees R Social Security (Partnership) Rules, 1968, was not ratified because it cannot be concluded. That the applicants fail to pay the due date of payment of compensation shall be allowed to appeal under section 20 (1) of the Provincial Employees \ Social Security Ordinance, 1965 The Supreme Court's holiday had passed to consider. Whether the facts of the present case had attracted the decision of the Supreme Court through legal heirs in the case of M. Imamuddin v. Syria Khartam.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Ghazi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.