Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR HAIDRI versus RANA M. HANIF

On the CCP Civil Procedure Code Order XXXVII Chat Tool of the CPC Summary Procedure O XXXVII, the R2 suit for the receipt of money has been granted by the trial court against the defendant's defendant. The fixed amount was to be settled between the parties, which is paid in installments of Rs. 10,000 every six months, therefore, the defendants cannot be directed to pay a nominal amount in monthly installments of Rs. 5,000. The court acting and acting has no jurisdiction to distinguish or amend this case. The agreement reached between the parties in connection with the execution of the decree was alleged by the reconciliation defendant alleging that he did not pay an installment even after 2 1/2 years had passed. The defendants did not bother to speak in the execution court for their alleged illness and failure to pay the immediate damages. It did not provide any evidence for the aforementioned disease or any receipt for the drug purchase. His conduct did not go beyond the board and he moved the petition for the first time after seeking the request of the claimant / order taker by bail and then canceling the settlement by the defendant through non-payment of non-bailable warrant installments. Was made and he may not claim execution according to the settlement certificate prepared by the plaintiff and issued by the manager of a bank which shows that after the settlement in the court, the defendant has 1 in the bank. In addition to Rs 99,768, some other liability was deposited. After about three months of history, 25,632 rupees list of advocates from Garh Maharaja lawyer