AISHA BIBI versus ABDUL HAMEED
Article 12 The contract executor for the specific performance of the contract for the contract executed the contract and refused to receive any payment from the claimant / seller of any part and explained that The plaintiff, whose son was a plaintiff, received a thumbprint on the plain. Documents to settle the issue of invoice invoice and that he never purchased the stamp stamp paper of the contract, which was 100 years old, refusing to implement the deal and no reason was brought on record. Why should a 100-year-old man decide to sell his property and that too when his son had a second son and a wife, the stamp buyer's thumb was not found on the back of this document. The secretary of the alleged contract on his own show was sentenced at least twice for fake deals and he has no explanation at all. How he knew the executioner, the legal process of the alleged contract for sale, and the recovery of any part of the venue as the outstanding amount, if not proven, to the trial court I was not considered to be valid and the judgment passed by the trial court was set aside by the High Court on appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Phagwar lawyer