Find a Lawyer

MALIK IRSHAD HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF NAGRA

The Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 RR 65 and 70 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), the counting of the section 3 intra-court appeal votes, the principal parties contested the election for the office of the Nazim and informed the Naib Nazim appellant as a retired candidate. Election was postponed Election Petition Election Tribunal directs authorities to submit polling record for re-counting of ballot papers Appellant hearing the order of the Election Tribunal before the High Court in the constitutional petition, the High Court Dismissed the constitutional request on the ground that the appellant raised all available objections There are dogs. After the final order was passed by the correctness of the electoral tribunal, only in the case of a dispute about the re-counting of ballots, the election record was the best evidence, if the facts were laid down, to force the ballot papers to be re-counted. Had to use In the application and the Election Tribunal was satisfied that the Election Tribunal for a re-counting case used its mind completely on the parties' respective convictions and directed the re-counting of votes, such instruction was under the Election Tribunal's discretion and the Tribunal. Did not use it arbitrarily. It was not necessary that only the LACC parties were included because it covered the entire constituency, so all efforts were needed to expedite the filing of the election petition and the election petition did not need to be treated as a civil suit. So that ballot paper has the power to recalculate. Interference in High Court decision rejected by the Election Tribunal at any stage of the proceedings online advocate from Swabi lawyer