JAVED BASHIR versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, LAHORE
Plaintiff's witnesses were present on three occasions in front of the Family Court in connection with the proceedings against Section 7, but despite providing ample opportunity for the defendants to inspect them, the same was not taken advantage of given that the defendant was cautioned. That was the last chance. , But the defendant, the Family Court, failed to investigate the plaintiff's testimony for reasons, in the family cases the parties to the legal proceedings were given attention to who the witnesses were and what they were about to dismiss. That if the evidence was given through an affidavit, the parties' counsel counsel can always examine the defendant's good excuse that he was not presented with copies of the documents later, at a later stage because they were useless. If such copies are not presented, the object may be taken before raising. Investigating the defendants' rights was justified by the Family Court because the defendant failed to take advantage of the last opportunity, and was granted to examine the defendant's testimony.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Feroz Walla lawyer