Find a Lawyer

AQAL ZAMAN versus MST. AZAD BIBI

Article 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for the recovery of the accused's case was that the plaintiff's father was paid by his father at the time of marriage. The court affirmed by the appellate court that nothing was available in the justification record to show that Dover was paid at the time of the marriage and that the defendant had fulfilled his obligation, demanding the intervention of the High Court. There was no irregularity or judicial error that was identified by the plaintiff courts. The High Court dismissed the constitutional petition in favor of the evidence and material on record. family advocate from Noor kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes