Find a Lawyer

KHALIL AHMAD SIDDIQUI versus PAKISTAN

R12A [As Entered Video Section 521 (1) / 2000, Dated 31 7 2000] Evidence of the Law (10 of 1984), Article 114 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Date of Birth, Correction Stoppel Attempts to correct his birth date by joining the service in 1965 by validating the date of birth of the public servant listed on the secondary school certificate and service record made by the same government employee in the year 1966 Was not complied with and the government employee did not specify that in order to reach the logical end of the service record in 1982, Why these people were asleep on the matter, and why they had not received a secondary school certificate from the relevant board, such facts were permanently erected. The government employee, Plya, a public servant, in 1998, denied him the NOC, because he was thought to be confused and confused when he came to India to collect a birth certificate. The case with someone else, especially when it was not picked up at the right time nor pursued at the right time, was clearly a matter of disruption by the conduct, which the government employee Prevented from seeking relief at such interim stages, which were listed once after the date of his birth, because of the R12A of the Code of Conduct, government services would be final, constitutional application was dismissed due to misunderstanding. advocates from Hyderabad lawyer