Find a Lawyer

SAHIBZAR versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) / 34 Definition of Proof immediately filed in the FIR contains all the relevant details of the incident in which the accused was named and paid by them during the incident. The complainant had fully justified his presence on the occasion given straightforward and loyal accounts of the tragedy and his mere statement was sufficient to maintain the conviction of the accused and his relationship with the deceased witness. It was not enough to exclude the conviction and, as the medical evidence expert opinion could not cross the ocular testimony which was consistent and reliable, the absconding accused did not satisfactorily explain it for three years. Who identified his crime and exhibited the conscience of his crime and the motive for the incident was FIR I was described as well as his statement. The complainant, but not his absence or weakness will not be prejudiced. The prosecution's case, which otherwise proved to be credible evidence, consisted of minor contradictions and errors in the complainant's testimony, which were supported by the receipt of medical evidence. , Matters related to the conviction and sentencing of the accused were retained pakistani advocates Village Sunder lawyer