Find a Lawyer

HAZRAT ZAMAN versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD. OF REVENUE N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR

Sections 49 and 56 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Product for the Recovery of the Plaintiffs Denied Their Occupation of the Suit Land The Revenue Officer's Approved Order was retained by the Collector, but the Commissioner The case was dismissed after remanding it to the Revenue Officer. Further remand order filed by the plaintiff with the direction of the appointment of a commission to confirm the physical possession of the defendants on the Board of Revenue filed, with the Board of Revenue being allowed, once the Board as a modification authority There was jurisdiction without options. The Board of Revenue used by the Commissioner under the Act was not available; the remand order passed to confirm the defendants' physical possession of the suit land was sufficiently valid as it was not properly discharged by the Commission on its application. Could not be decided from. Nothing on the record was available to show that the defendant was in the possession of the SO as the plaintiff's tenants but about the recovery of the product without any positive effort to confirm it. The plaintiff's claim will have no consequence, the High Court accepted the constitutional petition and canceled the improper order and order passed by the Collector and Revenue Officer. There is no legal option and no legal effect immigration advocates email from Daska lawyer