Find a Lawyer

IFFAT SIDDIQUE SULEHRIA versus MUHAMMAD NAEEM

Azad Jammu and Kashmir State Articles Act 1980 Section 5 Azad Jammu and Kashmir State Subject Rules, 1980, R7 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), Article 42 of the Domicile Posts specific to the J&K refugees settled in Pakistan. The Certificate Service Commission recommended the applicant for such a post. Such recommendations were challenged on the basis that the applicant had abandoned his former home in a district of Pakistan and obtained a domicile certificate from a district in Azad Kashmir. Yes, so she did not deserve this recommendation. The post The High Court on the petitioner's petition in 1996 accepted the constitutional request for the issuance of a district Domicile Certificate in Azad Kashmir, expressing his intention to remain permanently in Azad Kashmir, one in Azad Kashmir. The Domicile Certificate of the District was present, when the applicant applied for such post on the basis of the Domicile Certificate of a district in Pakistan. In 1991 the Domicile Certificate existed in the name of a designated applicant of a district of Azad Kashmir. At the time of applying for and then surrendering to him in the year 2002 Hand, when the process was in favor of the recommendations, they will leave. There is no doubt that she was not a refugee from Jammu and Kashmir settled in Pakistan. The marriage of a petitioner with a person who was a refugee from Jammu and Kashmir in Pakistan will not give her such status. Refused to allow appeals in circumstances. family advocate from Tando Allahyar lawyer