MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN versus CHAUDHARY MUHAMMAD BAKHSH (ADVOCATE)
Sections 13 and 17 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) AIX, Rr 13 and 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court jurisdictional question applied by the Appellate Authority to set aside the former party The order formally confirmed by the rent controller was validated by both the aforementioned forums, while deciding a constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution could not have come true in the same way, Which was neither taken up nor dealt with by the tribunals below the present case, however, extraordinary Proceeded to the resolution; in which the inquiry into the question of fact was effectively prevented and the respondents reduced the question of the complexity of the procedure, a senior advocate of the High Court who was involved in matters of law and technical fields of process. There are experts, different addresses, factual questions about the situation must be resolved and the inquiry of the rent controller by taking evidence, but in the case of non-formation of cases and non-interrogation, the former The order fix application acknowledged that the applicant had a question. , In their favor, that they may either further clarify their petitions in the petition or thereafter prove the allegations of fraud by presenting evidence in the High Court, taking full notice of the facts and its implications. Identified factual questions involving questions. In the present case and accepted for full justice, he took the stand in the constitutional petition that the High Court should take notice of the above questions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
