Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFOOR versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM

Section 42 filed in favor of the defendant for the declaration of realism of the General Power of Attorney, on which, he separated the suit land from the other defendants, was owned by the underground accused and allegedly The defendants had sold the plots. He said that the Power of Attorney, in favor of the plaintiff's other documents based on fake and fabricated documents, had self-examined and denied that he had removed the burden of document forgery. Has the document ever been implemented or appeared before the sub-registrar or the commission for the respondents of the registration, to prove the document was genuine, Mohr was examined by the office of the sub-registrar, who was the only sub-registrar Brought in to record that it was registered in the office. The commissioner, allegedly appointed by the sub-registrar, said in his cross-examination that he did not know the process of obtaining power. ey personally; that he was taken to the office of a property dealer, where some men and women were present, and that by this document he had restored the trust of the person being prosecuted and considered these persons genuine. Thumb impressions of hangings were found on. The power of the attorney; that they did not see all the executors' ID cards, because they did not have those cards, only three had the identity cards and they were executed for the purpose of getting their signatures and thumb impressions. Did not go home Thus, the statement of the local commissioner did not prove that the power of attorney was executed by the plaintiffs and the local commission ask a advocate free from Daud Khel lawyer