Find a Lawyer

ASMA NAZ versus MUHAMMAD YOUNAS QURESHI

Arts 30, 36 and 64 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 were declared factually ignorant of the plaintiff's discovery of the harmony of both the courts under the plaintiff's being the legitimate daughter of the defendant. What is the claim The plaintiff submitted to his father-in-law, who was neither a member of the family nor a special source of knowledge on the subject, the plaintiff also submitted some public documents to prove his claim, in which the plaintiff admitted to the plaintiff that Her daughter denies her relationship with the plaintiff and a copy of the petition herself signed by the plaintiff in which she refuses to be the defendant's daughter was presented by the trial court verbally and by the plaintiff. Dismissed the documentary evidence and, depending on the evidence of the defendant, dismissed the decision of this case and the firm approved by it The appellate court's accuracy of the trial was retained by the admission which was factually incorrect and was neglected and was not obliged to be filed by the plaintiff in the documents presented by the plaintiff, on the contrary. , Was not legally bound to be filed by the claimant by submitting an application to the police. The nature by which it cannot interfere with the findings of the jurisdiction over the facts against the plaintiff under the decision of the jurisdiction to confirm the final outcome of the evidence-based jurisdiction by the two main courts and under both the courts. The given orders have been retained. advocate from Thul lawyer