Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAISAL versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL

The appearance and non-appearance of the parties to CPC's Civil Procedure Code Order IX resulted in the cancellation of the OI, Rr 8 & 9 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 39, 42 and 54 of the suits Request for reinstatement of the prosecution When this case was first set up for evidence, it was dismissed at the earliest court hours because neither the plaintiff nor his lawyer appeared in court, restoring the case. The application for was transferred by the claimant within ten days from its date. In addition to his dismissal for illegal prosecution, the plaintiff's solicitor had filed his affidavit stating that he was involved with another bench application before copying the cause list. Confirms the fact that the lawyer's case for the plaintiff was settled before another bench. Such a plea was not disputed despite the plaintiff's absence in this date, although it was not satisfactorily explained, but the facts considering that the plaintiff's valuable rights were included in the lawsuit, Was in favor of a dispute resolution when the first trial was at trial when evidence was decided at an early stage of trial and dismissed for non-prosecution. It was not fair and equitable to request a qualification. And the case was restored to its original status as soon as the costs were paid. best advocate from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer