Find a Lawyer

ACHAR ALIAS BHAI KHAN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (a) and 302 (b) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (i) (ii) and 7 (b) West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13D Evidence Praised in a fierce gun battle between police and bandits. Where multiple shots were fired from both sides, it was humanly difficult to predict who delayed sending the ballistic express report to the Ballistic Expert, which is a positive delay, neither to be identified nor in inferior numbers. Staying safe. Crimes dismissed from the prosecution case will have no adverse effect, as one or two issues may be sufficient for the purpose of matching recovered weapons. The incident was not denied and did not challenge the medical evidence through defense evidence. There was no enmity of the prosecution witnesses or the accused had the motive to make false allegations and they also had no particular interest in their conviction. The recoveries were made in a realistic way, refusing to present people as witnesses. It was now a well-known and judicially recognized fact that the prosecution's witnesses were not challenged And they were not rejected The value of his identity has been obtained Remittance was available in favor of the accused for lesser punishment; the punishment of the offender under section 2302 (a) was changed to section 2, 302 (). Gaya, PPC convicted and the accused convicted were retained. ask a advocate free from Domeli lawyer