AKHTAR HASSAN ANSARI versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (2) of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), against the accused on the charge of Section 9 bail, does not show that he abused his authority. Is that the accused had made himself dishonest and fraudulent in his association with another. The accused has exploited or exploited in any way or exploited his or her legal authority and damaged the state treasury for the benefit of anyone, or by exploiting any grant, privilege or benefit to others. Allowed it Neither the person nor any of his relatives described in Section 9 of the NAB Ordinance Prosecution can indicate whether the rules or office orders were violated by the accused's alleged case, thus section 497 ( 2) Further investigation is required under CRPC. The bail was granted as per bail to the accused who was entitled to exemption in bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer