Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR LALIKA versus CH. SAJJAD AHMED

Representation of Section 99 (IA) (cc) of the Public Act 1976 [as amended by the People's Representation (Amendment) Ordinance (XXXVI of 2002]] on the basis of a degree issued by the Canadian School of Management The nomination papers were not rejected by an overseas university grant commission of Pakistan, whose degree was not recognized by the University Grants Commission of Pakistan, could not be barred from contesting the election. Whether the degree was real or fake was presented to an election tribunal that the candidate was a graduate, he was awarded a university grant. The election could not be excluded simply by the provisions of the Automation Panel for recognition of its degree, which resulted in the candidate being excluded from electron combat. Supposedly, the inclusion had to be made and the court had to bow down in favor of the subject. The candidate had shown the original credentials. Programs, which he completed in 28 articles, in the presence of certificates, it can be assumed that the candidate was a graduate. At the Canadian School of Management Order of Business Administration, the Election Tribunal rejected the nomination papers of a candidate who is not a graduate, with the instruction that the Returning Officer publish the candidate's name in the list of candidates. patent advocate from Rahwali lawyer