Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAMIL versus IRSHAD BEGUM

Cantonment Rent Restrictions Act 1963 Section 17 Bona house is a personal requirement. Landlady lives in a place the tenant's tenant wanted to put an M into. The landlord wanted to sell the house after the holiday because he had contracted a sale with someone else. The woman and her son, who was living in a hostel rental home in M, had accepted the evacuation request. The sale agreement was not presented in evidence for the validity and the tenant presented to the stamp seller to prove the agreement but he accepted that the stamp paper was purchased in the name of the landlord but He never came to know about the sale agreement on the property and did not enter the same in his register. The stamp seller's register did not have an ownership signature or identification card number. No independent evidence was confirmed for Landlady in the statement alone. The witness said in clear words that he intended to shift to M and wanted to stay in the disputed house, assuming that there was a sovereign house on the landed property but that the law was still tenant or The rent controller was not given a choice as to where he should go. Her own personal testimony as a private landlady was the perfect testimony to personally presenting the need for La Andeladei to prove that she wanted to live in a controversial home with her children, who grew up The son of a disputed landlord did not need to be specially educated in the M High Court. online advocate from Hala lawyer