Find a Lawyer

TAQIUR REHMAN, FAISALABAD versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR CUSTOMS (IMPORT), DRY PORT, FAISALABAD

Dump Truck on Violation of Import Policy Order 2001, Option to pay fines in exchange for seized goods, Customs Act 1969 Sections 180, 181 and 196 Section RO No. 1374 (I) / 98, dated 17 12 1998 Show cause of importation was not contested by appellant authority The notice alleges that they were charged and the confiscated vehicles tribunal upheld the order to retain milk. Was not born or the appellant did not contest the import of goods or this fact was affected by the prohibition contained in the import policy order. Was not effective. The appellant should, on the first occasion before the Adjustment Authority, take up all matters and defense of his facts, though such silence by him, even if it was not accepted as an admission, has made it his own. The matter was made so weak that the vehicles were inspected by the departmental authorities and they were subjected to the mischief of the Import Policy Order, 2001, in the same case as the Tribunal obtained from expert opinion. Could have Either way, it should be said that he has ordered his rational principle to be without any rational basis. The appellant had never competed or requested for a physical examination of the vehicle outside the departmental authorities, at this stage there was no case for seeking remand for a new physical examination of the vehicle. Under the circumstances online advocate from Khangah Sharif lawyer