Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus MUHAMMAD IKRAM ALIAS MUHAMMAD AKRAM

Sections 2 (b) and 7 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Section 439 charged with defining the age-defining evidence of the child, to be himself a survivor In the sense of claiming, the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 moved a petition to set aside the case, and with the said ordinance, the aforesaid trial court examined the accused from the Medical Board, which stated that the accused was 23 years old. And accordingly, at the time of the incident, she was about 20 years old, however, the radiologist, however, called a dental surgeon around the radiologist who had suggested that the medical board The default age is not right and this may affect two to three years. Upon inquiry into her parents' marriage and the inquiry by the station house officer of the relevant police station, the trial court ordered the separation of litigation. The Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, the accused who dealt with them generally, does not seek the original record in the proceedings for the amendments, but is presented under the mandate of the trial court, the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000. ? And the parties, by consensus, also found discrepancies and irregularities in the records relating to the birth of the child and the parents' marriage, and the unusual features of binding the respective registers on the respective registers of the Union Council were Radiologists and Dental. The surgeon had no opportunity to be summoned, even if he was summoned, his opinion could be interpreted in any way and there was nothing in the record nor any competent record. best advocate from Kashmir lawyer