Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR-UL-HUSNAIN versus OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Section 5 and 6 (1c) of the Oil and Gas Development Corporation Ordinance 1961 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Executive Group I to Executive Group III standards The Assistant Officers (Non-Technical) and Assistant Officers (Technical) were both first placed in NPS 16, after the introduction of the pay scale rather than the pay scale, were placed in Executive Groups I and II respectively, the Assistant Assistant Officers ( The non-technical change was that they were exchanged with EGI. There will be no money for the EG II promotion as both categories belong to Assistant Officers and to promote uniformity between the Assistant Officer (Non-technical) and Assistant Officer (Technical), they should be promoted from EGO I to EG III. Have the right to In the past, the service tribunal dismissed the appeal of the appellant on the basis that the Assistant Officer had been placed in the EGI, without having served five years in the EG III. EG II and similar variants cannot be treated the same. Both the Validity Assistant Officer (Non-technical) EG I and the Assistant Officer (Technical) EG II fall into the same category of employees, in which case no discrimination can be done. Promotion in the next higher group, ie, EG III to EG III, will not be claimed by the Appellants for EG III, which will not conflict with the policy decision taken by the Board as in its letter of 28 1 1980. I have clearly stated that there are standards of development and other employment conditions. There will be no change of officers after the introduction of paygroups when the Supreme Court accepts the appeals and the appeals pakistani advocates Nilam lawyer