Find a Lawyer

SHAMSHAD ALI versus SENIOR POST MASTER (DELY), ISLAMABAD G.P.O., ISLAMABAD

Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R 5 Mandatory Retirement Department Inquiry Professional Irregular Government employee was working as a clerk in the Treasury Branch of the General Post Office envelopes and a government employee drew stamps worth millions. Was taken and taken away. After several weeks, the showcasing notice was issued to the account civil servant and in response to the notice, the public servant acknowledged the delay and due to which the work was speedy, after being satisfied with the response of the public servant, authorities imposed In addition to the mandatory retirement department appeals, as well as appeals submitted by the service tribunal, the plea taken by a public servant was told that they had received evidence about allegations made by the authorities and regular inquiries. Did not have the opportunity to reject as provided under R5. Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973 Not Validated Helming evidence against a public servant and his own admission, the Supreme Court ruled that the government employees (competence and discipline) rolls. Regular investigations were not made under R5 of 1973, the Service Tribunal carefully considered the material available and approved the decision. The service was based on valid and valid reasons by the tribunal and the law enforced by the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court relaxed the sentence for compulsory retirement from the service, with the Supreme Court interfering with the decision passed by the service tribunal. Was denied. Dismiss immigration advocate from Hunza Nagar lawyer